lundi 28 janvier 2008

New pipeline to transport Iraqi gas via Turkey


http://www.todayszaman.com/tz-web/detaylar.do?load=detay&link=132627


The state-owned Turkish Pipeline Company (BOTAŞ) has launched feasibility studies for the Turkish segment of the planned Iraq-Turkey natural gas pipeline, to be built parallel to the existing Kirkuk-Yumurtalık oil pipeline. BOTAŞ will complete the segment of pipeline that crosses through Turkey's territory along a Silopi-Bismil-Şırnak-Diyarbakır-Yumurtalık line.

The project aims to transfer 10 billion cubic meters (bcm) of Iraqi natural gas annually to the Turkish and world markets. The project management will be carried out by the Iraqi Oil Ministry and the BOTAŞ-Turkish Petroleum Corporation (TPAO) joint initiative, according to a memorandum of understanding signed on Aug.17, 2007, between the Turkish and Iraqi energy ministers.

The project will be completed by private contractor Tekfen, TPAO and BOTAŞ according to projections as to developments in Iraq and the energy need in European markets.

The project is an integrated one covering the exploration, extraction, processing and transportation of natural gas in Iraq's northeast. Around 10 bcm of natural gas will be extracted from five different fields and then transported to world markets through Turkey.

The construction tender will be held by BOTAŞ, as was the case with previous projects, and the tender will be open to international bidders. The pipeline will be 30-40 inches wide and will include many pump stations, proportional to the amount of gas the line is to carry. A liquid natural gas (LNG) terminal will be established in Yumurtalık to process and transport a portion of the gas to world markets via supertanker.

Turkish Energy and Natural Resources Minister Hilmi Güler previously said talks regarding the Iraq-Turkey natural gas pipeline were on track and that the estimated 280 bcm of natural gas in Iraqi reserves would be exported to European markets via Turkey.

28.01.2008
Today's Zaman Ankara

Türkler ile Kızılderililerin kökenleri aynı

ABD'nin New York kentinde düzenlenen 'Türkler ile Kızılderililer Arasında Ortak Bağlar' adlı panelde, 'Tarihî köklere dayalı bir ilişki var mı?' sorusunun cevabı arandı.


28 Ocak 2008, Pazartesi

Türkler ve Kızılderililerin müziklerinin de seslendirildiği panelde ilginç iddialar ortaya atıldı.
ABD'de faaliyet gösteren İstanbul Üniversitesi Mezunlar Derneği'nin (İÜMEZUSA) Türkevi'nde düzenlediği etkinlikte, George Washington Üniversitesi'nden Prof. Dr. Türker Özdoğan başkanlığında Türklerle Kızılderililer arasında tarih, kültür, dil, Şamanizm inancı ve el sanatlarında kendini gösteren benzerlikler tartışıldı. Kızılderililerin, Amerika kıtasına Orta Asya'dan göç ettiği ve köklerinin Orta Asya Türklerine dayandığı yönünde öne sürülen çeşitli görüşlere yer verildi.

Kullanılan ortak kelimelerden örnekler sunuldu. DNA testlerinin yapılmasıyla son yıllarda Türkler ile Kızılderililer arasındaki bağların net bir şekilde ortaya çıktığını kaydeden Prof. Dr. Türker Özdoğan, Orta Asya'daki Türkler ile Sibirya Türkleri ve Kızılderililerin DNA örneklerinin çakıştığını söyledi. Özdoğan, Kızılderililerin Bering Boğazı'ndan Amerika kıtasına göç ettiklerini ifade ederek, en son MS 1233 yıllarında göç edenlerin Cengiz Han'dan kaçan Uygur asıllı Türk grupları olduğunu söyledi. DNA çalışmalarıyla bilinen Dr. Levent Bozatlı, İstanbul'dan telefon bağlantısıyla katıldığı gecede, Oxford Üniversitesi Genetik Bilimleri Bölümü'nde yaptırdığı DNA analizine göre, köklerinin ABD'deki en büyük Kızılderili kabilelerinden Onedia ile aynı özellikteki Djigonasse klanına ait genler olduğunu açıkladı.

Bozatlı'nın bu sözleri başta Onedia Kabilesi Başkanı Brian Paterson olmak üzere panelist ve izleyiciler arasında şaşkınlığa yol açtı. Kızılderililer ve Türkler arasında pek çok yakınlığın bulunduğuna dikkati çeken Georgetown Üniversitesi öğretim görevlilerinden Prof. Dr. Özdoğan, "Atatürk de bu konuyla oldukça yakın olarak ilgileniyordu." dedi. Tüm Kızılderililerin Türk kökenli olmayacağını iddia eden Georgetown Üniversitesi Sosyoloji-Antropoloji Bölümü öğretim üyesi ve editörlerinden Prof. Dr. Marjorie Mandelstam Balzer ise panel sonunda görüş değiştirdi. Balzer, "Ben iyi gözlemleyen bir antropolojistim.

Kızılderililerin büyük bir çoğunluğu Türk kökenli, bu gece inanılmaz bir kaynaşma vardı aralarında, sanki yıllardan beri birlikte yaşayan halktan kişiler gibi davrandılar birbirlerine." diye konuştu.

Zaman

More relief aid needed in Mosul after blast

BAGDHAD, 28 January 2008 (IRIN)

- Essential relief items are needed to continue relief operations, and maintain an emergency stock, for affected families in the northern city of Mosul, the Iraqi Red Crescent Society (IRCS) said on 28 January.

At least 60 people, mostly women and children, were killed and 280 wounded as a result of a massive blast followed by a suicide attack against a senior police official on 23 January in Mosul, the IRCS said. Iraqi officials from the defence and interior ministries put the toll at 36 dead and 170 wounded in the explosion, which occurred when a cache of munitions, stored by insurgents in a house in west Mosul's Zanjili suburb, blew up.

In a report on its website, the IRCS said the most needed relief items were food, kitchen sets, mattresses, blankets, medical supplies, milk for infants, bottled water, suits and vests for disaster management volunteers, and canned food. "The attack led to the destruction of at least 100 houses," the IRCS said, adding that there were probably further dead bodies beneath the rubble. The IRCS said the attack would increase the suffering of Iraqi families already living in a very difficult situation resulting from armed conflicts and frequent disasters.

Preparedness An official at the IRCS's Disaster Management Department in Baghdad said the organisation has three strategic warehouses in central, southern and northern Iraq in order to reach nearby affected areas. "We are prepared for all kinds of crisis and our teams are working very hard to meet the needs of the affected people nationwide," said the official who asked not to be named for security reasons. "We are facing challenges that all Iraqi people face, but things could happen here and there to our teams as they do their work, like attacks and explosions, but in general we feel like we are welcomed and accepted in all areas," the IRCS official said.

Relief activities have been coordinated with the relevant governmental and non-governmental agencies. Tents have been erected for families who lost their houses, and food and medicines distributed.

There was coordination with the Turkish embassy to ensure delivery of humanitarian aid from the Turkish Red Crescent to Iraq in the first 24 hours after the incident, it said. The Turkish donation, IRCS said, included 300 food baskets and medical items and the transfer of seven casualties to hospital in Turkey.

On 27 January Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki blamed al-Qaeda for the explosion and ordered troop reinforcements and tanks to be sent to Mosul for an assault on Al-Qaeda in its urban stronghold.

sm/at/cb
http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?ReportID=76456

Video: The American military did the explosion in Mosul

Posted on : Roads to Iraq
January 27, 2008


As I said before the (un)controlled explosion in Mosul done by the Americans but because it went wrong western media reported that it was a terrorists attack.
Here is a video clip shows eyewitnesses, residents of Zndjeli area tell their story to an Iraqi government official.
http://nl.youtube.com/watch?v=dZRfZO9oCjk



Translation:

Eyewitness: they took the weapons only [not the explosions] and put it in their vehicles, they timed the explosion and runaway to the nearby streets, my family asked the American:
It will be a big explosion, it is better if we leave our houses.
He answered:
No, it is not a big explosion, just leave the windows open and sit beside the walls, it will be alright.
Later the houses fell on our heads

Posted on: http://www.uruknet.info/?p=40588

Link: http://www.roadstoiraq.com/2008/01/27/video-shows-that-mosul-explosion-was-done-by-the-american-military/

Operation Desert Slaughter - Thoughts on Holocaust Memorial Day

Baquba morgue


by Felicity Arbuthnot

January 27, 2008
It is seventeen years since America and Britain embarked on their 'Final Solution' for the population of Iraq. The forty two day carpet bombing, enjoined by thirty two other countries, against a country of just twenty five million souls, with a youthful, conscript army, with broadly half the population under sixteen, and no air force, was just the beginning of a United Nations led, global siege of near mediaeval ferocity. Having, as James Baker boasted they would, reduced 'Iraq to a pre-industrial age', the country was denied all normality : trade, aid, telecommunications, power, sanitation, water repairs, seeds, foods, pharmaceuticals, medical equipment.


As I write, seventeen years ago, Iraq would be entering the second week of a barbaric, near twenty four hour a day, carpet bombing, which, then, as now (lest we forget - yet again) scrupulously ignored Protocol 1, Additional to the Geneva Convention of 1977: 'It is prohibited to attack, destroy, remove or render useless objects indispensible to the survival of the civilian population, such as foodstuffs, agricultural areas for the production of foodstuffs, crops, livestocks, drinking water installations and supplies such as irrigation works (denying them) to the civilian population or to the adverse Party ... for any motive.'


The blitzkrieg on Iraq deliberately targetted all 'indispensable to survival'. Within twenty four hours, most was destroyed. The electricity went off within two hours, leaving patients on life support machines and vital equipment, babies in incubators, or those on oxygen to die. Refrigerators defrosted, all medicine needing refrigeration, blood banks and vital saline solutions for the injured were destroyed. Food rotted and between the bombing and the bank closures (latter for fear of looting) replacements were scarce to unbuyable.

In Najav, seventy dialysis patients, 'old friends', said the senior nurse in charge of the unit, died for want of electricity. The water supply was deliberately destroyed, parts denied subsequently by the pathetic, US-UK dominated Sanctions Committee - a Committee without a backbone between them - and remains lethal to this day. The plan, by US Central Command, it seems, all along. (See: How the US deliberately destroyed Iraq's water. by Thomas J Nagy : http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NAG108A.html%20- 19k - )

The destruction of Iraq's water system has been described by Professor Nagy and Stephanie Miller as: 'a slow motion holocaust'. Few could have put it better.The telecommunications tower was also one of the earliest casualties, an elegant, soaring, structure on the edge of Baghdad's Mansur district. It lay, broken and crumpled, as did the remains of those who worked inside it. Iraq was thus cut off from the world, the extent of the bombing and atrocities largely unknown for considerable time.

Iraqis throughout the world had no way of knowing if their families, friends, loves, were dead or alive. Radio and television stations across Iraq were blitzed so no warnings to populus could be given (journalists too have special protection in wars, but decison makers, seemingly are not only illiterate, but igmore legalities.)

Hospitals, health clinics, schools and kindergartens were bombed, education eradicated so totally that the stores for educational materials, in buildings separate from the schools (usually in a central distribution point some miles away) were also bombed.Agriculture in all forms was deliberately targetted. Chicken farms bombed, flocks of sheep and goats, broadly half of all buffalo were killed, dairy farms obliterated. Crops, food processing factories reduced to rubble.

A war crime stupendous in its immensity, for which not one murderous, genocidal, infanticidal, decision maker or pilot has stood trial. Pharmaceutical factories were bombed, the medical syringe factory was destroyed. And in an especially psychotic policy, the countries who were Iraq's trading partners and had built factories and installations for the country, bombed those which they had built. America's gung-ho goons whoopeed over bombing the Pepsi and Coca Cola factories. 'Bravery' doesn't come more deviant, sub-normal and retarded than that.

Due to the use of defoliants and napalm, half of all Iraq's trees, including the great, ancient palms, died. Remaining palms did not bear their succulent fruit for about five years. In the tranquil, family farming settlements, amongst the palms, women and livestock alike aborted and often died. Survivors consistently described a 'vapour' coming from the 'planes, then the horrific aftermath, affecting those living in the shelter of the palm groves or copses of trees, where dwellers settled for relative cool from Iraq's searing summers. And,of course, in this decimation from above, which dropped more ordinance daily than was dropped daily in the second world war, five times more explosive power was dropped than on Hiroshima.
The weapons used were depleted uranium, which continues to irradiate Iraq and the region, the people, flora and fauna -and will continue to do so for four and a half billion years.'..protection of the natural environment against widespread, long term and severe damage', is another absolute dictate under the Geneva Convention. It proscribes absolutely '... damage to the natural environment (prejucing) the health and survival of the population.' Contraventions don't come bigger than condemning inestimable generations yet unborn, to death and deformity.

The Nuremberg Principles are excercised by the treatment of both civilians and prisoners and the: '... murder or ill treatment ...of prisoners of war ... further, extermination ... and other inhuman acts against any civilian population'.The 'inhuman acts', committed against the Iraqi people in 1991 constitute war crimes which, since no one was brought to justice, one can only hope haunt those responsible for all time.

The slaughter on the Basra Road, after the ceasefire, the fleeing civilians and retreating troops, ripped to pieces, or incinerated in General Norman Schwartzkop's 'turkey shoot'. The whole war, of course, was nothing else. Saddam Hussein had offered, indeed, started to retreat from Kuwait before the carnage began, but as ever, for the United States, concilliation was 'too late'.

Buses, lorries, cars were also targetted throughout the forty two day massacre. Lorries carrying medicines, meat, essentials were burned, with their drivers.Western troops took their repulsive 'trophy photos', with the pathetic remains of the incinerated and dismembered. When the (UK) Observer, to its credit, printed the picture which became the symbol of the 1991 atrocitites, the Iraqi soldier, with his near melted face welded to the windscreen of his vehicle, there was an outcry. The sensitivites of readers should not be exposed to such horrors.

Maggie O'Kane, writing in the Guardian Weekly (16th December 1995) describes searingly, reality. Relatives, praying, hope against hope, that those they loved, had somehow miraculously survived the hadean inferno that was the Basra Road massacre.

"On the day the war ended, at a bus station south of Baghdad, dusk was falling and the road was covered with weeping women. The Iraqi survivors of the `turkey shoot' on the Basra Road were crawling home with fresh running wounds. Their women were throwing themselves at the battered minibuses and trucks, pulling, pleading, begging. `Where is he, have you seen him ? Is he not with you ?' Some fell to their knees on the road when they heard the news. Others kept running from bus, to truck, to car, looking for their husbands, their sons or their lovers - the 37,000 Iraqi soldiers who would not come back. It went on all night and it was the most desperate and moving scene I have ever witnessed."


There was worse. Think of the excesses of horrors the Western media has deluged its readers with over the years, those pepetrated by people of other cultures, with other features: Stalin, Pol Pot, indeed Saddam Hussein and consider this in Maggie O'Kane's article:
' When Sergeant Joe Queen returned to his home town of Bryson City North California, after the Gulf war, the first thing he saw was a huge banner draped outside Hardees Burger Restaurant, which read: `Welcome Home Joe Queen.' Joe Queen, who'd been awared a bronze star, wanted to chill out after the war, but Bryson City wouldn't let him Joe, 19-years old, had gone straight from Desert Storm to become one of the first American troops to cross the Saudi border in an armoured bulldozer. His job was to bury the Iraqis alive in their trenches and then cover over the trenches real smooth so the rest of the Big Red One, as The First Armored Mechanized Brigade is called, could come nice and easy behind him.' Joe Queen doesn't know how many Iraqi troops he buried alive on the front line.

But five years later, in his military base in Georgia, he remembers well how it worked: `The sand was so soft that once the blade hits the sand it just caves in right on the sides, so we never did go back and forth. So you are travelling at five, six, seven miles an hour just moving along the trench... You don't see him. You're up there in the half hatch and you know what you got to do. You did it so much you could close your eyes and do it... I don't think they had any idea because the look on their faces as we came through the berm was just a look of shock.`While I was retreating, I saw some of the soldiers trying to surrender, but they were buried.

There were two kinds of bulldozers, real ones, actual ones, and also they had tanks and they put something like a bulldozer blade in front of them. Some of the soldiers were walking towards the troops holding their arms up to surrender and the tanks moved in and killed them. They dug a hole in the ground and then they buried the soldiers and levelled it.'

One survivor described the friends buried alive, who he had laughed with, eaten with ...'I really don't know how to describe it. We were friends. I ate with some of them. I talked to some of them. I cannot express how I felt at that moment..... I saw one soldier and his body was just torn apart by a bulldozer. The upper part was on one side and the lower on the other side.'


I hope your nightmares and those of your colleagues haunt for all time Joe Queen. May the spectre of those for whose live burial you and your murderous colleagues were responsible, follow in all your footsteps, for all time.
These mass graves also carry the names of the leaders who ordered the decimation of Iraq in 1991, their military Commanders and soldiers, on every one of them. Ironically, the mass graves of Saddam Hussein have seemingly not materialised, just war graves and those from the uprising encouraged by the US and UK at the end of the 1991 decimation.

The war, of course, never ended. The thirteen year subsequent embargo cost maybe one and a quarter million lives. Additionally, the US and UK, bombed Iraq (illegally) until the (illegal) invasion of 2003. In 2002, they stepped up their destruction of life, limb and of entire housing projects with families within, children playing, doing homework, flocks of sheep and goats with their child shepherds.


'Approximately a year before the United States initiated Operation Southern Focus, as a change to its response strategy, by increasing the overall number of missions and selecting targets throughout the no-fly zones to disrupt the military command structure in Iraq. The weight of bombs dropped increased from none in March 2002 and 0.3 in April 2002 to between 8 and 14 tons per month in May-August, reaching a pre-war peak of 54.6 tons in September 2002.' (Courtesy Wikipedia.)


A recent study by the Centre for Public Integrity, has also uncovered lies of impeachable stature, leading to invasion, by the Bush Administration.. ' The study counted 935 false statements in the two-year period. It found that in speeches, briefings, interviews and other venues, Bush and administration officials stated unequivocally on at least 532 occasions that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction or was trying to produce or obtain them, or had links to al Qaeda, or both.


'Bush led with 259 false statements, 231 about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 28 about Iraq’s links to al Qaeda, the study found. That was second only to Powell’s 244 false statements about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and 10 about Iraq and al Qaeda.' (h ttp://http://www.publicintegrity.org%20/)
Iraq's post invasion (2003-2007) excess under five mortality has been estimated at over one million.

In Afghanistan, post invasion, at 1.9 million (2001-2007.)

For another humanitarian abomination of our time, the Israeli siege of the Gaza strip (June 2007 and ongoing)total excess death figures are elusive. CIA figures for infant mortality, however (2004) are woeful at 23.54 per thousand births. Sweden (2007) just 2.76 per thousand births. Given Israel's withdrawal of electricity and just about all needed to sustain life since last June, some serious statistical data is needed - and relentless and absolute demands for humanity and human rights for our global neighbours in Gaza, Iraq and Afghanistan, the forgotten of Lebanon's 'Simmer Rain' decimation, by 'we the people ...'

Like Joe Queen's genocidal actions, the atrocities committed in these countries are being carried out in our name. 'Silence is complicity'. (For much more shameful complicity - since 1950 - please see Dr Gideon Polya: 'Body Count', an academic, key and indispensable work: http://www.globalbodycount.blogspot.com%20/)

'There was no one left to kill', declared General Norman Schwartzkopf after the Basra Road bloodbath, where even the injured holding white flags, and doctors accompanying them were obliterated. 'Morally, we won', an Iraqi doctor told me shortly afterwards. Indeed. 'We are the new Jews', is an oft heard, Arab refrain now.

As I write, on Holocaust Memorial Day, it is impossible not to reflect that is does not take forced labour camps, forced transport and Zyclon B to create a holocaust. When the figures of the dead in Iraq, Afghanistan and Gaza, reach six million, as the world stands by, will they too get their own Holocaust Memorial Day? Will we all, regardless of colour or creed, ever learn, before it is too late?


see also:
Remembering the night Operation Desert Storm was launched on Iraq

dimanche 27 janvier 2008

WORLD AGAINST THE WAR DEMONSTRATION

STOP THE WAR COALITION
NEWSLETTER No. 1031
27 January 2008
Email office@stopwar.org.uk

T: 020 7278 6694
Web: http://www.stopwar.org.uk/


IN THIS NEWSLETTER:
1) WHY WE'RE STILL MARCHING
2) MAKE 15 FEBRUARY IRAQ DAY
3) END THE SEIGE OF GAZA NOW
4) PLEASE DONATE TO OUR APPEAL
5) THE CAIRO CONFERENCE

*********************************
1) WHY WE'RE STILL MARCHING
*********************************
On his recent trip to the Middle East, George Bush said: "Iraq
is now a different place. Levels of violence are significantly
reduced. Hope is returning to Baghdad."
http://tinyurl.com/2j5lqa


Try telling that to residents of the southern outskirts of
Baghdad, whose homes were flattened on January 10, when US
bombers unleashed 40,000 pounds of explosives in the biggest
aerial attack since March 2003, killing or injuring dozens of
civilians, many of them women, children and the elderly.

Try telling it to the thousands of Iraqis who were the victims
of US bombing raids in 2007, which quadrupled compared to
2006, rising from four attacks a week to four attacks a day.
(http://tinyurl.com/yqbonu)


It's the same story in Afghanistan, where the Washington Post
reported recently the number of air strikes doubled in 2007 to
a staggering 3,572 -- an average of close to 10 per day. In
2005, by comparison, there were around 200 air strikes.
http://tinyurl.com/yqbonu


These increasing levels of carnage come from the man who
accuses Iran and Syria of "fomenting violence" in the region
and whose main purpose in his visit to the Middle East was to
set up arms deals with a number of countries, which will get
weapons of mass violence at an estimated cost of 20 billion
dollars. (http://tinyurl.com/26gvcg)


These include Israel, visited by Bush at the very time that
its siege of Gaza was facing worldwide condemnation (see
below) for what United Nations representatives called "illegal
measures and practices against the Palestinian civilian
population". Bush's gift to Israel in the cause of promoting
peace in the region was to confirm that under a 100 million
dollar arms package, Israel would get a new consignment of the
very latest "smart" missiles, which it used to such horrific
effect in its 2006 attack on Lebanon.

We keep marching and protesting because these policies of mass
murder and devastation are opposed by the vast majority of
people in this country, the USA and worldwide.

It is why on Saturday 15 March, the Stop the War Coalition has
joined with the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament and the
British Muslim Initiative in calling a national demonstration
in London, as part of the worldwide day of protest against
George Bush's wars on the fifth anniversary of the Iraq
invasion, when there will be demonstrations from Washington to
Beirut, from Sydney to Seoul.

WORLD AGAINST WAR DEMONSTRATION
Called by Stop the War Coalition, CND and BMI
SATURDAY 15 MARCH
ASSEMBLE TRAFALGAR SQUARE 12 NOON
MARCH TO PARLIAMENT

More details: http://www.stopwar.org.uk/

TRANSPORT: Coaches to the WORLD AGAINST WAR are being
organised around the country. For details, see:
http://tinyurl.com/2da68c

Iraq: The forever treaty

SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER EDITORIAL BOARD

January 28, 2008

With the clock ticking on our "commitments" in Iraq -- the international mandate expires in less than a year -- the Bush administration is left in an interesting position. It could create a plan for a troop withdrawal; instead, the plan being negotiated with the Iraqi government focuses on reasons to stay there, something The New York Times reports is seen by Democrats as a plan that would "bind the next president by locking in Mr. Bush's policies and a long-term military presence."

And we're starting to learn about the byzantine tactic being employed to get this done. Senior administration officials will say they're not interested in permanent bases in Iraq. They use terms like "long-term" and "enduring" (U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said as much on Thursday). It's all a matter of slyly edited statements, woven to obscure their true meaning and aim: What's being crafted is a treaty. Iraqi leaders seem to know this, and describe what's being negotiated (formally named "Declaration of Principles for a Long-Term Relationship of Cooperation and Friendship Between the Republic of Iraq and the United States of America") as a "long-term treaty."

The reason that distinction is important is this: A treaty requires Senate ratification.
Supporting Iraq "in defending its democratic system against internal and external threats" is the first principle of the declaration. But according to Michael Rubin (an expert on the domestic policies of Iraq, Iran, Turkey and more), who testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday, "Any langauge...which would commit U.S. forces to defend Iraq in the face of an external threat would transform the agreement into a treaty subject to Senate ratification."

Imagine what this will mean for the next administration: A pre-packaged deal, leaving our military stuck in Iraq for decades to come, to guard against "external threats" -- which external threats are they talking about? Could it be that the Bush administration is positioning itself for an attack on Iran? Or perhaps we're to offer our troops as support for an Israeli attack on Iran? It's not farfetched. The president has surely done his best yet to establish Iran as a real military threat, despite the lack of a shred of credible evidence.

Consider that he and his allies uttered no fewer than 935 false statements (when can we start calling them lies, by the way?). Falsehoods got us into Iraq; let's not allow them to keep us there.

seattlepi.nwsource.com/opinion/348804_basesed27.html

samedi 26 janvier 2008

Iraq's natural resources should be controled by the central government!

http://www.iwpr.net/?p=icr&s=f&o=342253&apc_state=henh

Rifts over oil, Kerkuk and Peshmerga threaten alliance between Kurdish authorities and central government.

By Wrya Hama-Tahir in Sulaimaniyah (ICR No. 244, 25-Jan-08)

Excerpt

Tensions are building between Kurdish leaders and Arab prime minister Nouri al-Maliki’s government in Baghdad, threatening to divide two of Iraq’s strongest political allies.

Kurdish leaders accuse Maliki’s government of not acting on issues most important to the Kurds, such as resolving a dispute over ownership of Kerkuk province and the funding of Kurdish forces known as the Peshmerga.

At the same time, the Iraqi Kurdish government has forged ahead with signing private oil contracts without the approval of the central government, irking Baghdad and reigniting debates about how much power Iraq’s regional governments should hold.

The Kurdish Alliance, the second-largest political bloc in the country, holds 53 of Baghdad parliament’s 275 seats and are members of Maliki’s Shia-led government. The recent tensions have damaged one of the strongest alliances in Iraq’s severely fractured political landscape.
..............
Iraqi Kurdistan’s decision to sign independently about 15 oil contracts with international firms is one of the most contentious issues.

The region approved an oil law last year that paved the way for the agreements. The politically paralysed central government has yet to vote on a national oil law.

The Iraqi constitution states that central government controls oil revenues, however it does not stipulate who should manage issues like oil contracts and production.

The Kurdistan Regional Government’s natural resources minister Ashti Hawrami is in Baghdad this week to try to resolve the oil contracts dispute with the oil ministry, according to the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan’s news service. Nechirvan Barzani, the KRG’s prime minister, was not able to resolve any of the issues during a visit to Baghdad earlier this month.

Iraqi oil minister Hussein al-Shahristani deems the KRG’s contracts illegal and has threatened to bar oil firms working for the Iraqi Kurdistan authorities from doing business with Baghdad.

Last week, in a challenge to the Kurds, 145 MPs from a dozen political lists - including Sunni and Shia Arabs, Turkoman and Yezidis - signed a declaration supporting the central government’s control over all of Iraq’s natural resources.

The MPs also said that Iraq’s political factions should resolve the future status of Kerkuk without a referendum. Although Article 140 of the Iraqi constitution called for a plebiscite to be held on Kerkuk by the end of 2007, the vote has been postponed in part because of rising violence in the province.

The delays over Kerkuk, an oil-rich city which is home to Kurds, Turkoman and Arabs, has frustrated Kurdish leaders who want it to be administered by the KRG. Kurdish leaders are under heavy public pressure to bring Kirkuk under KRG control, as many Kurds believe that Kerkuk is a historically Kurdish area.

The late Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein carried out several ethnic cleansing operations in Kerkuk to change the demography of the province. Thousands of Kurds and Turkoman were displaced from the city and Arabs replaced them. Meanwhile, the KRG is waiting for Maliki to approve funds for 80,000 Peshmarga fighters, and there is an ongoing debate over how much revenue Iraqi Kurdistan should receive from central government: The Kurds maintained that they are 17 per cent of the population and, as such, are entitled to 17 per cent of oil revenues, while non-Kurds have argued that Kurds are only 13 per cent of the population. Iraq has not had an accurate census in decades.


Wrya Hama-Tahir is an IWPR correspondent in Sulaimaniyah. Zainab Naji contributed to this story from Baghdad.